Alex says: Perfection in itself is impossible to maintain, especially when in the creation of a society. Too many personal desires get involved and divide the final answer. I think instead of perfection, a society must reach a level of compromise that tends to everyones needs rather than everyones wants. Only then can a culturally combined society thrive under laws that protect everyones individual rights to exist as themselves.
As members of a society, are we constantly only thinking about ourselves or do we think of others and how are decisions may affect others?
In terms of your constitution groups, were the laws you created realistic to today's society, or just an outline of the perfect society we all wish to live in?
Would you consider having a veil of ignorance a positive or negative thing for society? Do the laws you constructed in groups somewhat reflect thinking with a veil of ignorance?
No comments:
Post a Comment